Skip to content

DC Mayor Bowser Shifts Tone Amid Trump’s Federal Takeover Of Capital Police

Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has altered her response to President Donald Trump’s recent move to place the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control, signaling a shift amid escalating tensions over law enforcement jurisdiction in the nation’s capital.

On August 11, 2025, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, officially placing the D.C. police force under direct federal authority. This rare maneuver allows the president to take command of the local police amid concerns of violent crime, although statistics indicate a significant decline in violent offenses in the district over the past two years.

Mayor Bowser initially responded cautiously, affirming that the city would comply with the president’s directive while expressing concern about the precedent it set. She highlighted that the action underscored the enduring need for D.C. to gain full autonomy over its governance, championing the cause of D.C. statehood as a remedy to federal overreach.

“While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented, I can’t say that given some of the rhetoric of the past that we’re totally surprised,” Bowser stated earlier in the week, recognizing the gravity of the federal intervention but maintaining a measured tone.

However, as the federal takeover intensified with the deployment of federal agents and the National Guard within the city, Mayor Bowser’s rhetoric has hardened. By August 13, 2025, she urged residents and political allies to act robustly against what she described as “an authoritarian push” from the Trump administration.

In a notable public statement, Bowser emphasized the necessity for political mobilization, calling on citizens and lawmakers to “do what we can in our space and our lane to protect our city” and stressed the importance of electing a Democratic House to serve as a political backstop against federal overreach.

The move by President Trump, which he defended as a crackdown on crime, has been met with skepticism and alarm from local officials. The D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973, which grants the city limited self-governance, was cited by the president as legal justification for the federal takeover, but critics argue it subverts local authority and the democratic mandate of the city’s government.

Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith indicated the police force would continue cooperating with federal partners as usual, despite the shift in oversight. The delicate balance between federal authority and local governance remains a contentious issue, with implications for how law enforcement powers are exercised in the nation’s capital.

Mayor Bowser’s evolving narrative—from cautious acceptance to open resistance—reflects the high-stakes political and constitutional battle unfolding in Washington. The situation highlights the city’s ongoing struggle for full self-determination and the broader national debate over federalism and executive power.

As Washington braces for further developments, all eyes remain on the city’s leadership and their strategies to navigate this unprecedented federal intervention in local law enforcement.