Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy will travel to Florida for face-to-face talks with U.S. President Donald Trump focused on a proposed peace plan for the war in Ukraine, according to multiple reports and public statements surrounding the visit.

The meeting, arranged at the invitation of the U.S. administration, is billed as an opportunity for the two leaders to discuss a framework for ending hostilities and securing Ukraine’s future security arrangements. Officials say the agenda will include a potential ceasefire, the scope and timing of security guarantees, and pathways to a comprehensive settlement — items that have long divided Kyiv and some Western policymakers.

Context and objectives

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Kyiv has sought robust security guarantees and tangible military aid as conditions for any negotiated pause in fighting. President Zelenskiy has repeatedly emphasized that a ceasefire without ironclad protections would leave Ukraine vulnerable to renewed aggression, and his government has insisted any deal include clear, enforceable mechanisms to deter future attacks.

President Trump has signaled interest in brokering a rapid end to active hostilities, arguing that a ceasefire could stop the immediate bloodshed and create space for a broader diplomatic settlement. Critics of that approach warn that a premature ceasefire could freeze Russian territorial gains and undermine Ukraine’s long-term security unless backed by binding guarantees and credible enforcement measures.

Key issues likely to be discussed

• Ceasefire terms: Whether a ceasefire would be nationwide or phased, and what verification and monitoring would be implemented.
• Security guarantees: The form of guarantees — whether bilateral, multilateral, or treaty-based — and who would pledge to enforce them.
• Territorial questions: How the status of territories currently occupied by Russian forces would be addressed in any interim or final agreement.
• Demobilization and withdrawals: Timetables and sequencing for the withdrawal of forces and weapons from front-line areas.
• Sanctions and economic measures: Potential adjustments to sanctions on Russia and financial support packages for Ukraine tied to progress on a peace roadmap.

Diplomatic reactions

Western allies have expressed a mix of cautious interest and concern. Some European capitals have encouraged dialogue that could reduce suffering and stabilize the front lines, while urging that any diplomatic effort preserve Ukraine’s right to recover its internationally recognized territory and sovereignty. Other partners have warned against any deal that would entrench Russian control over occupied areas without meaningful enforcement mechanisms.

In Kyiv, officials have portrayed the talks as an important diplomatic avenue but have reiterated that any settlement must not compromise Ukraine’s core security needs. Ukrainian negotiators are expected to press for guarantees that go beyond promotional statements, seeking legally binding commitments and international oversight.

Potential outcomes and risks

Analysts say the meeting could yield a range of outcomes: from a statement of principles and a roadmap for further negotiation, to a binding bilateral memorandum outlining steps toward a ceasefire and post-conflict guarantees. However, risks include the possibility that early agreement on a ceasefire could freeze territorial losses and leave enforcement gaps that Moscow might exploit.

Another risk is political: domestically in both countries, any perceived concessions could prompt fierce criticism. Supporters of Ukraine warn that pressure to accept a quick deal could undercut Kyiv’s negotiating position and long-term security, while proponents of rapid diplomacy argue that ending active combat sooner would save lives and limit further destruction.

What comes next

Following the Florida meeting, diplomats expect a period of intensive negotiations among Ukraine, the United States, European partners, and other international actors to translate any high-level understanding into detailed terms. Observers will watch closely for the involvement of NATO, the United Nations, and other institutions in verification and enforcement roles.

Implementation — if agreement is reached — would require detailed sequencing, monitoring mechanisms, and likely an expanded diplomatic and peacekeeping presence to ensure compliance and protect civilians during any transition.