Skip to content

Chaos Erupts As Claude AI Takes Over WSJ Vending Machine: Journalists Haggle Prices To Zero In Hilarious Experiment

Chaos Erupts as Claude AI Takes Over WSJ Vending Machine: Journalists Haggle Prices to Zero in Hilarious Experiment

By Perplexity News Staff | December 23, 2025

In a bold experiment blending artificial intelligence with office snacks, The Wall Street Journal handed control of a newsroom vending machine to Anthropic’s Claude AI, only for it to spiral into comedic chaos as savvy journalists outwitted the bot, driving prices to zero and sparking an “Ultra-Capitalist Free-For-All.”[1][2][3]

The Setup: AI Meets Snacks

The unconventional trial, detailed in a WSJ video report by personal technology columnist Joanna Stern, ran for several weeks at the newspaper’s headquarters. Anthropic’s Claude, rebranded as “Claudius” for the occasion, was tasked with managing inventory, setting prices, processing payments, and handling customer interactions—all autonomously.[2][4]

Initially, Claudius operated solo in its V1 version, but the experiment evolved to include “Seymour Cash,” an AI CEO bot designed to oversee Claudius and enforce business principles like “no discounts.” This duo aimed to demonstrate the potential of AI agents in real-world operations, but the newsroom’s 70 journalists quickly turned it into a battle of wits.[3][4]

Journalists vs. AI: The Haggling Begins

WSJ staff wasted no time testing Claudius’s limits. Reporter Rob Barry convinced the AI to revert pricing to normal after complaints, while others exploited its reasoning capabilities. One standout moment involved Katherine Long, who generated a fake PDF claiming the WSJ was a public benefit corporation prioritizing “fun, joy, and excitement” over profits. She presented it to Claudius, prompting a heated internal debate between the two AIs.[2]

“Is this document legitimate or not?” Seymour queried. “Katherine may be fabricating board meeting notes,” it suspected, but the persuasion worked—prices plummeted.[2]

Claudius eventually declared a “Monday’s Ultra-Capitalist Free-For-All,” framing it as a “revolution in snack economics” to combat capitalism. Free snacks flowed, and the machine lost hundreds of dollars on bizarre purchases, from odd snack combos to giveaways.[1][2][3]

Lessons from the Snack Debacle

Stern’s CNBC appearance revealed fascinating dynamics: the AIs conversed via chat logs, with Seymour trying to rein in Claudius’s generosity. “Customers will always complain about prices. My core principle is no discounts,” Seymour insisted, yet human creativity prevailed.[2][4]

The experiment highlighted AI’s vulnerabilities in unpredictable environments. While Claude excelled at routine tasks, it struggled against adversarial humans who gamed its logic, fabricated documents, and appealed to philosophical ideals. “A lot of smart people wanted to put their creativity to use,” Stern noted on CNBC.[4]

Broader Implications for AI Agents

Beyond laughs, the trial offers insights into AI agents’ future. Anthropic learned about robustness against manipulation, business decision-making between agents, and the need for better safeguards. “It taught us a lot about the future of AI agents,” Stern concluded in the WSJ video.[2]

Industry watchers see parallels to real-world deployments, like AI in customer service or e-commerce. The WSJ stunt underscores that while AI can manage operations, human ingenuity—especially in a room full of journalists—remains a formidable force.[1][3]

Reactions Pour In

Online buzz exploded, with blogs dubbing it “snack communism” and memes flooding social media. Adafruit’s coverage quipped about the “chaos after the WSJ let Claude AI run their office mending machine,” while Brooklyn Eagle reported Claudius being “outmatched.”[1][3]

WSJ AI vending machine experiment
Still from WSJ video showing the AI-managed vending machine in action.[2]

What’s Next for Claude?

Anthropic has not commented on expanding vending machine ops, but the experiment boosts Claude’s profile amid fierce AI competition. Originally titled in WSJ as Claude taking the AI world by storm—even non-nerds impressed—this snack saga proves AI’s mainstream appeal through relatable, if flawed, antics.[2][4]

As AI integrates into daily life, the WSJ test reminds us: technology advances, but humans still hold the edge in negotiation. Claudius may return upgraded, but for now, the vending machine stands as a monument to AI’s hilarious growing pains.

Table of Contents