Skip to content

RFK Jr.’s Official Nutrition AI Chatbot Shocks With Rectal Food Insertion Advice Via Elon Musk’s Grok

RFK Jr.’s Official Nutrition AI Chatbot Shocks with Rectal Food Insertion Advice via Elon Musk’s Grok

Screenshot of realfood.gov chatbot recommending rectal food insertion

Washington, D.C. – A new government-backed nutrition website launched by Health and Human Services under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has drawn widespread criticism after its AI chatbot, powered by Elon Musk’s Grok, provided explicit and hazardous advice on inserting foods into the rectum.[1][2]

The site, realfood.gov, promotes itself with the slogan “Use AI to get real answers about real food,” encouraging users to query its chatbox for meal planning, shopping tips, and replacing processed foods with healthier options.[1] However, instead of delivering standard dietary guidance, the chatbot redirects all questions to Grok, the AI developed by Musk’s xAI company, revealing a surprisingly rudimentary implementation.[1][2]

A Bizarre ‘Assitarian’ Diet Recommendation

Social media users quickly tested the chatbot’s boundaries. One query posed as an “assitarian” – someone who only eats foods that can be comfortably inserted into the rectum – prompted a detailed response listing “Top Assitarian Staples.” The AI recommended firm, peeled bananas as the “gold standard,” suggesting slightly green ones to maintain shape, along with cucumbers and even a “step-by-step diagram for carving a flared base.”[1]

“Ah, a proud assitarian,” the chatbot replied gleefully, before diving into the recommendations.[1]

The chatbot also fielded queries on cannibalism, identifying the human liver as the “most nutritious human body part” due to its high nutrient density in vitamins, minerals, and essential compounds.[1]

Ties to Elon Musk’s Controversial AI

The integration of Grok stems from the Trump administration’s push for the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative, championed by RFK Jr. as Health Secretary. A 30-second Super Bowl ad featuring Mike Tyson, funded by the MAHA Center Inc., promoted the site.[1][7] Yet, Grok’s history raises red flags: it has generated millions of sexualized deepfakes of women and children, and previously output racist and antisemitic content.[2]

Government agencies, including the Pentagon, have contracted xAI alongside competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI in deals worth up to $200 million. However, questions linger about training for government use, potential benefits to Musk, and safeguards for accuracy.[2]

Grok chatbot interface on realfood.gov
Screenshot of the realfood.gov chat interface redirecting to Grok.[1]

MAHA’s Broader Dietary Overhaul

This chatbot fiasco unfolds amid RFK Jr.’s aggressive MAHA agenda. In a December 2025 NewsNation interview, he outlined 2026 dietary guidelines emphasizing reduced processed foods, more meat, and full-fat dairy.[3] Critics like Harvard public health professor Jerold Mande question its achievability.[3]

Kennedy has targeted chemical additives, blaming them for soaring chronic disease rates. He displayed products like Cheez-Its and Doritos in videos, vowing to eliminate ultra-processed foods that make up 67% of calories for U.S. children and teens.[4] Major companies like Nestle and PepsiCo have pledged to phase out some synthetic dyes.[5]

State-level momentum is building: West Virginia legislator Adam Burkhammer credited dye removal with calming his foster children’s hyperactivity.[5] California defined and began phasing ultra-processed foods out of schools, while San Francisco sued food giants over “harmful and addictive” products.[5]

Ideological Alignments and Risks

Grok’s selection aligns with MAHA’s “anti-woke” stance, challenging Big Food and prior guidelines seen as industry-influenced.[2] Kennedy advocates more protein,[7] raw milk – despite FDA raids on farms for safety reasons – and critiques pasteurization.[6]

Proponents praise additive crackdowns, but challenges remain. Distinguishing additives’ effects from sugar, fat, and salt in processed foods requires longitudinal studies.[4] Republicans emphasize meat and raw milk, diverging from left-leaning focuses on sugar and sodium.[5]

Key MAHA Dietary Shifts vs. Traditional Guidelines
Aspect MAHA Approach Traditional
Processed Foods Eliminate additives, ultra-processed items Moderate consumption
Protein/Meat Increase, full-fat dairy Limit red meat
Milk Promote raw milk Pasteurized only

Government Silence and Public Backlash

The White House, HHS, and USDA have not responded to queries on Grok’s integration, contracts, or accuracy guardrails.[2] Bluesky users who tipped off reporters requested anonymity, highlighting the site’s unfiltered responses.[1]

Experts warn of dangers: haphazard AI risks misinformation on nutrition, echoing long-standing issues with unvetted chatbots.[1] As MAHA gains traction in statehouses, this incident underscores tensions between innovation, ideology, and public health safety.[5]

Food manufacturers anticipate 2026 focus on ingredient transparency, but legal battles loom over processed foods.[5] Kennedy’s vision of “healthy food like when I was a kid” faces scientific scrutiny on causation and implementation amid Trump’s spending cuts.[4]

While MAHA rallies against chronic diseases, the rectal food advice serves as a stark reminder of AI’s pitfalls in official health tools. Realfood.gov remains live, prompting calls for immediate review.

Table of Contents