Clintons Reach Deal with House Oversight for Closed-Door Depositions in Epstein Probe
Chappaqua, New York – Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today as part of an ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking network, following an agreement on deposition terms after months of delays and defiance of subpoenas.
The closed-door deposition, taking place in Chappaqua, New York, marks a significant development in the bipartisan probe into the federal government’s handling of investigations involving Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton has been accused of any wrongdoing related to Epstein’s crimes, but their connections to the financier have drawn scrutiny amid unsealed documents.[1][2]
Agreement Reached After Subpoena Battles
House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) announced that the Clintons “caved” and agreed to transcribed, filmed depositions following threats of contempt proceedings. Hillary Clinton’s session is scheduled for today, February 26, 2026, with former President Bill Clinton set to appear tomorrow, February 27.[2]
The committee’s pursuit began in October 2025. Initial deposition dates for both Clintons were postponed at their requests—citing funerals—but they declined subsequent accommodations, leading to missed appearances on January 13 and 14, 2026. Committee documents detail recommendations for contempt charges after exhausting negotiation options.[3]
“Republicans and Democrats on the Oversight Committee have been clear: no one is above the law—and that includes the Clintons. After delaying and defying duly issued subpoenas for six months… the Clintons completely caved.”
— Chairman James Comer, House Oversight Committee[2]
Topics for Hillary Clinton’s testimony will zero in on Epstein and Maxwell’s alleged exploitation of ties to powerful figures, including the Clintons, to evade accountability, as well as government mishandling of the case originating in Florida post-Bill Clinton’s presidency. Notably excluded are Republican-favored issues like the 2012 Benghazi attack or her private email server.[1]
Historical Context and Clinton Connections
Epstein, a convicted sex offender who died in 2019, maintained relationships with high-profile individuals. Bill Clinton has acknowledged flying on Epstein’s plane multiple times but denies visiting his private island or knowing of crimes. Hillary Clinton states she has no recollection of meeting Epstein.[1]
Recent releases of Epstein-related files have prominently featured the Clintons’ names, prompting bipartisan calls for testimony despite no allegations of misconduct. The depositions, requested behind closed doors per committee policy, will be video-recorded, diverging from initial pushes for public hearings.[4]
Investigation Scope Broadens
The Oversight Committee’s inquiry examines potential ethics violations by elected officials, mismanagement of Epstein probes, and influence peddling. Sources familiar with the plans emphasize focus on Epstein and Maxwell’s network, not personal Clinton conduct unrelated to the case.[1]
This marks a rare instance of former presidents and top officials compelled under subpoena for such testimony. NBC reports highlight the historic nature, noting both parties’ consensus amid mounting document disclosures.[4]
Political Ramifications
The agreement averts contempt votes but underscores partisan tensions. Comer framed it as a victory for accountability, while Democrats joined in insisting no one evades congressional oversight. Past Republican probes into Clinton scandals like Benghazi and emails are off-limits here, narrowing the scope.[1][2]
As Hillary Clinton heads into questioning this morning, the depositions could yield new insights into Epstein’s web of influence, government lapses, and elite protections—or reinforce denials of deeper involvement. Transcripts and footage, once released, will fuel public discourse on accountability in high places.
The probe continues amid broader Epstein scrutiny, including Maxwell’s conviction. Outcomes may influence ethics reforms or future investigations into federal handling of trafficking cases.