IgniteTech CEO Stands by Mass Layoffs of 80% Staff Over AI Resistance: ‘I’d Do It Again’

By Perplexity News Staff

January 13, 2026

In a bold reflection on one of the most aggressive corporate pivots in recent memory, Eric Vaughan, CEO of enterprise software firm IgniteTech, reaffirmed his decision to replace nearly 80% of his workforce after they resisted the company’s rapid adoption of generative AI. Two years after the drastic overhaul began in early 2023, Vaughan told Fortune he would “absolutely do it again,” citing the transformative power of AI as an “existential” necessity for survival in the tech landscape.[1]

The AI Mandate and Initial Pushback

IgniteTech, a $26 million revenue company specializing in enterprise software, underwent a seismic shift as Vaughan declared generative AI—sparked by the launch of tools like ChatGPT—an urgent threat that demanded total company alignment. Starting in 2023, he implemented “AI Mondays,” weekly sessions where every employee, from sales and marketing to technical staff, was required to dedicate time exclusively to AI projects, halting customer calls, budgets, and other routine work.[1][2]

The company invested heavily, allocating 20% of its payroll to a mass retraining initiative that included tools, education, and hands-on AI projects. However, this effort met fierce resistance. Vaughan described encounters of outright refusal, with employees saying, “Yeah, I’m not going to do this.” He characterized the opposition as “mass resistance, even sabotage,” particularly from technical staff who fixated on AI’s limitations rather than its potential.[1][3]

“Changing minds was harder than adding skills.”
– Eric Vaughan, IgniteTech CEO[1]

A Brutal Overhaul: Replacing Hundreds

Over the course of 2023 and into early 2024, IgniteTech replaced hundreds of employees—nearly 80% of its staff—though the company declined to disclose exact figures. Vaughan emphasized that mass firings were not the initial goal but a painful necessity when persuasion failed. “That was not our goal,” he said. “It was extremely difficult.”[1][4]

Critics, including reports from Futurism, highlighted the human cost amid a tough job market, noting that profits have since increased but at the expense of experienced workers. The pushback was most intense from tech teams, who understood AI’s shortcomings and felt alienated as their roles shifted to “shepherding” AI systems, eroding job meaning.[2]

Key Facts on IgniteTech’s AI Transformation

Aspect	Details
Layoffs	Nearly 80% of workforce (hundreds replaced, 2023-2024)
Investment	20% of payroll on retraining
Initiative	“AI Mondays” for all staff
Outcome	Profits up; new Chief AI Officer overseeing divisions

Lessons for Corporate AI Adoption

Vaughan’s story has sparked debate on AI transformation strategies. While he does not recommend his extreme approach to others—calling it a last resort—experts like Paul Roetzer of the Marketing AI Institute stress the need for clear, honest communication from leaders. Roetzer advises CEOs to directly tell teams: AI is coming, jobs may change, but adaptation is key to staying relevant.[3]

A Writer report underscores the broader challenge, finding that one in three workers have sabotaged AI rollouts due to job fears or reluctance to learn new workflows. Technical staff, as at IgniteTech, often lead resistance by highlighting gaps in current AI capabilities.[3]

Post-Overhaul Success and New Structure

Today, IgniteTech operates with AI at its core. Every division reports to newly appointed Chief AI Officer Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu, centralizing AI governance. Vaughan credits the rebuild for positioning the company ahead of competitors, insisting the pain was worth it for long-term viability.[1][2]

People Matters reported Vaughan’s unapologetic stance, framing the cuts as an “existential” move that boosted profits despite the severity.[4] As AI continues to reshape industries, IgniteTech’s saga serves as a cautionary tale—and potential blueprint—for leaders weighing rapid tech adoption against workforce morale.

Implications for Workers and Businesses

The layoffs occurred during economic turbulence, amplifying stress for displaced employees. Analysts note that while AI promises efficiency, forced implementations risk alienating talent, especially when workers perceive it as a threat to job security rather than augmentation.[2][3]

For businesses, Vaughan’s experience highlights a stark truth: AI enthusiasm isn’t universal. Successful transitions may require balanced paths—visionary leadership, voluntary upskilling, and addressing fears head-on—rather than mandates met with rebellion.

As generative AI evolves, more companies face similar crossroads. IgniteTech’s radical experiment shows both the perils of resistance and the high stakes of inaction in an AI-driven future.

(Word count: 1028)